The cost answer depends on three variables, not one. Insulation quality decides how many kWh the home actually needs. Technology decides how efficiently the chosen fuel delivers heat (a heat pump turns one kWh into two to four kWh of heating; a gas furnace converts about 90% of the gas it burns to heat). The BC Hydro stepped rate decides how much the marginal electric kWh costs. Change any of those three and the winner of the cost question changes.
A leaky home needs much more heat than a tight one. The fuel costs less to the household with the tight envelope because the home uses less of it.
Heat pump > baseboards. Modern gas furnace > older gas furnace. The technology decides how much heat each fuel unit produces.
A home that pushes deep into Step 2 every winter pays more per electric kWh than a home that stays in Step 1.
The non-obvious thing: the comparison most often quoted (gas vs electric baseboards in a leaky home) is the worst case for electricity, because baseboards are the lowest-efficiency electric technology and the leaky home pushes consumption deep into Step 2. Swap the technology to a heat pump and the same home flips the answer in many cases.
Who wins by scenario
| Scenario | Electric tech | Gas tech | Usually cheaper to run |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poorly insulated 1970s home, Vancouver Island | Baseboards | Mid-efficiency gas furnace | Gas |
| Same home with cold-climate heat pump | Heat pump | Mid-efficiency gas furnace | Close to even; heat pump may edge ahead |
| Well-insulated 2010s home, Vancouver | Heat pump | High-efficiency gas furnace | Electric (heat pump) |
| Apartment, Vancouver, gas hot water | Baseboards (gas hot water) | Wall furnace | Gas (for water heating) |
| New build, Net Zero target, Kelowna | Heat pump + electric hot water | Not applicable | Electric |
Indicative scenarios. The actual answer for a specific home depends on a heat-loss calculation, current gas commodity prices, and the household\'s consumption pattern.
The non-obvious thing: the debate keeps moving, but in one direction
Over a decade, three things have moved the comparison toward electric. First, cold-climate heat pumps have become standard, which dramatically improves the efficiency of electric heating. Second, the BC carbon tax on natural gas has been rising every year, narrowing the per-kWh-equivalent gap. Third, CleanBC fuel-switching rebates have lowered the upfront cost of switching, making the long-run operating savings easier to capture.
Over the same decade, the BC Hydro stepped rate has remained the structural defence of gas heat: as long as Step 2 is meaningfully more expensive than Step 1, a poorly-insulated all-electric home pays a premium that a gas-heated home does not. That is why the fuel-switching rebate is paired with rebates for insulation and air sealing; the policy goal is to move the home out of the leaky-and-electric scenario where gas would win, into the tight-and-electric scenario where electric wins cleanly.
For a household today, the practical takeaway is that the answer is not "gas, full stop" or "electric, full stop". It is "what is the right combination of envelope improvements, technology, and rate option for this home". Most households who run that calculation end up with a heat pump and the rebate stack that funds it.
How to actually answer the question for your home
-
01Pull your last 12 months of bills.
BC Hydro on MyHydro, FortisBC on Account Online. The actual kWh and gigajoule consumption for your home, not the generic average, is what decides which fuel costs more in your case.
-
02Book a pre-retrofit EnerGuide evaluation.
The evaluation models how much energy your specific home would use under different heating setups (baseboards, heat pump, gas furnace, dual fuel). The output is the only quantitative answer to the cost question for your address.
-
03Compare the three scenarios honestly.
Stay on current gas system. Switch to heat pump with rebates. Hybrid (heat pump + gas backup). The evaluation report ranks them. Look at year-1 cost, year-5 cost, and year-15 cost; the long-run picture often differs from the year-1 picture.
-
04Run the rebate-stacking calculation.
For a fuel-switching project, CleanBC Better Homes funds the conversion, BC Hydro funds the equipment, and the income-qualified stream (if eligible) significantly raises both. Read the stacking guide.
-
05Decide on time horizon.
If you plan to sell the home within five years, the upfront cost recovery matters most. If you plan to stay 10+ years, the operating-cost trajectory dominates. Both are valid framings; pick yours before talking to contractors.